Skip to main content

Complete use of RequiredFieldValidator

It's very common to use asp:RequiredFieldValidator to validate form data before submission. Using this for a TextBox is very straight forward, but Today, I came to know that the same can be used effectively to validate asp:DropDownList and asp:RadioButtonsList too. Lets know, how this can be done.

First of all, the usage depends on the Binding of List Items. If all the Items are static and added with <asp:ListItem> as below

<asp:DropDownList ID="ddlAddress" Width="150" runat="server">
    <asp:ListItem>-select-</asp:ListItem>
    <asp:ListItem>Item1</asp:ListItem>
    <asp:ListItem>Item2</asp:ListItem>
</asp:DropDownList>

Here first item is optional and used for DropDownList in general. Now, the RequiredFieldValidator for this dropdownlist will be as following:
<asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="rfvaAddress" InitialValue="0" ControlToValidate="ddlAddress" runat="server" ErrorMessage="*" CssClass="Note" />
Here InitialValue is an optional property which is used to mention the Item, which should be selected by default.

But in general the dropdowns are binded in code-behind. If we have an initial item with select text, the value for that select item should be string.Empty. If you don't have this default item, the first item will be selected by default and there is no use of RequiredFieldValidator.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Solution Array for List in WCF

Here is another common problem encounters with WCF Service in initial days. Suppose there is a method which returns a List of Objects the proxy will be generated as method which returns an array of objects. Reason: This problem is due to the default interpretation of collections. While generating proxy for the service all the collections are by default interpreted as arrays. That is why all the lists will be converted to arrays. Solution: If you are generating proxy by adding service reference from visual studio directly, there will be a 'advanced' button. Click that button and select the System.Generic.List as your Collection. This will resolve the problem. If you are generating proxy with svcutil here is the command to do the job. svcutil.exe http://ServerName/ServiceName/Servic.svc?wsdl /collectionType:System.Collections.Generic.List`1 or in short svcutil http://ServerName/ServiceName/Servic.svc?wsdl /ct:System.Collections.Generic.List`1 for more information go through this ...
1 comment
Read more

Linq: Query for multiple join conditions in Linq to SQL

This is common to join a table with another on multiple conditions, Like Select * from Customer c Join Invoice i on c.CustomerID = i.CustomerID and c.CustomerTypeID = i.CustomerTypeID I need to write a Linq to SQL query for the same scenario. But the syntax for this query is a bit different to expect. The Linq query is as follows: From c in DataContext .Customers Join i in DataContext .Invoices on new { c.CustomerID, c.CustomerTypeID } equals new { i.CustomerID, i.CustomerTypeID } *DataContext in the above query should be replaced with actual datacontext name.
3 comments
Read more

Troubleshoot WCF service returning object with null fields

When you are working with WCF service for the first time, generally you will get this error for some reason. Here is the description of the error: WebServiceReference . ServiceClient client = new WebServiceReference . ServiceClient (); WebServiceReference . ImplementationRequest req = new WebServiceReference . ImplementationRequest (); req = client.GetRequest(); Here the Method GetRequest will return an object of ImplementationRequest. Everything will run without any error but the req object will contain all null fields/ majority null fields. Solution: Those nulls are due to error in generating the proxy for the Data Contract defined by the service. Verify that [DataMember] attribute tag is given for all the data fields and [DataContract] for the Class. If those attributes are missing, the object will be generated with null values. If all fields have the tags but the issue is not resolved, then the service reference should be re-added and the proxy should be re-generated. Then t...
1 comment
Read more